Hi Alex
Did you get a chance to look at this? Any plans for when it might go in? Cheers Steve -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vernet Sent: 04 April 2006 22:35 To: OPS Users Subject: Re: [ops-users] Implementing utility pipelines as custom processors, with a migration path to java implementation On 4/3/06, Stephen Bayliss <[hidden email]> wrote: > This is done, a zip file is attached with modified and new files. This > is based on CVS HEAD from this morning (and unit tests run and passed on > this also). Thank you for this contribution. I will look at the code and post an follow-up email here when this is done. > This way the test cases for oxf:pipeline are modified, it means the new > processor automatically gets run through the new tests. > > Hope this is ok with you. Let me know if you need anything changing. Yes, that sounds very reasonable. > By the way, the pipeline processor doc link doesn't work on your web > site, but does appear to work on my local installation (the link is > http://www.orbeon.com/ops/doc/processors-pipeline but it takes you to > http://www.orbeon.com/ops/doc/reference-xpl-pipelines, don't know why). Good catch. We have a number of redirections done at the Apache level to handle obsolete URLs, but apparently there was an error there as /ops/doc/processors-pipeline is current and should not be redirected. It is fixed now. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Administrator
|
On 6/20/06, Stephen Bayliss <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Did you get a chance to look at this? Any plans for when it might go > in? Hi Steve, Sorry for the delay. This slipped through the cracks. I created a P7 entry in the tracker for this and it is now on my short list of high priority issues (I am counting one P9, and six P7 as I write this). http://forge.objectweb.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=305604&group_id=168&atid=350207 Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
--
Follow Orbeon on Twitter: @orbeon Follow me on Twitter: @avernet |
In reply to this post by Stephen Bayliss
Thanks! Any questions about it then drop me an email, or if you feel
any additional work/changes needs doing on it then let me know. Steve -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vernet Sent: 27 June 2006 23:03 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [ops-users] Implementing utility pipelines as custom processors, with a migration path to java implementation On 6/20/06, Stephen Bayliss <[hidden email]> wrote: > Did you get a chance to look at this? Any plans for when it might go > in? Hi Steve, Sorry for the delay. This slipped through the cracks. I created a P7 entry in the tracker for this and it is now on my short list of high priority issues (I am counting one P9, and six P7 as I write this). http://forge.objectweb.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=305604&grou p_id=168&atid=350207 Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |