Hi Guys
Is there are a known problem with xdb:update and
eXist? I'm running the latest version of eXist externally.
I have a few end users who are accessing a
form solution (a bit like DMV forms) simutaneously and occasionally I
get:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException
The result is the form detail
they are trying to save gets corrupted and lost. I'm saving everything to
file along the way and there is nothing out of the ordinary there, all seems
fine. I've been through various re-writes etc trying to pin the
problem.
Anyway, is there some config for:
<p:processor
name="oxf:xmldb-update">
..to explicitly state locking, or protected write
access? I'm pretty sure that the problem is around this...
Please help, I'm getting a real kickin' of my
client.
Thanks
Lee
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Administrator
|
Lee,
Who throws the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException, OPS or eXist? You should be able to figure this out by looking at the stack trace. Anyway, eXist would be in charge of handling multiple concurrent accesses, although it is hard to completely exclude that OPS is doing something wrong. I don't know of any parameters you can pass to eXist via XML:DB to control that behavior, but you may want to ask this on the exist-open mailing-list - and it would be great if you could report the results back to ops-users! -Erik Lee Bamford wrote: > Hi Guys > > Is there are a known problem with xdb:update and eXist? I'm running the > latest version of eXist externally. > > I have a few end users who are accessing a form solution (a bit like DMV > forms) simutaneously and occasionally I get: > > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException > > The result is the form detail they are trying to save gets corrupted and > lost. I'm saving everything to file along the way and there is nothing > out of the ordinary there, all seems fine. I've been through various > re-writes etc trying to pin the problem. > > Anyway, is there some config for: > > <p:processor name="oxf:xmldb-update"> > > ..to explicitly state locking, or protected write access? I'm pretty > sure that the problem is around this... > > Please help, I'm getting a real kickin' of my client. > > Thanks > Lee > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] > For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Hi Erik
It is an ops error, I've attached the stack trace. Forgive the format, the client didn't know how to email the detail so faxed ! Many thanks Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Bruchez" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [ops-users] xdb:update > Lee, > > Who throws the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException, OPS or eXist? You should > be able to figure this out by looking at the stack trace. > > Anyway, eXist would be in charge of handling multiple concurrent > accesses, although it is hard to completely exclude that OPS is doing > something wrong. > > I don't know of any parameters you can pass to eXist via XML:DB to > control that behavior, but you may want to ask this on the exist-open > mailing-list - and it would be great if you could report the results > back to ops-users! > > -Erik > > Lee Bamford wrote: >> Hi Guys >> >> Is there are a known problem with xdb:update and eXist? I'm running the >> latest version of eXist externally. >> >> I have a few end users who are accessing a form solution (a bit like DMV >> forms) simutaneously and occasionally I get: >> >> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException >> >> The result is the form detail they are trying to save gets corrupted and >> lost. I'm saving everything to file along the way and there is nothing >> out of the ordinary there, all seems fine. I've been through various >> re-writes etc trying to pin the problem. >> >> Anyway, is there some config for: >> >> <p:processor name="oxf:xmldb-update"> >> >> ..to explicitly state locking, or protected write access? I'm pretty >> sure that the problem is around this... >> >> Please help, I'm getting a real kickin' of my client. >> >> Thanks >> Lee >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> -- >> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] >> mailing list. >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] >> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help >> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > > -- > Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] > mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] > For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > Error Message 210706.tif (58K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Erik Bruchez
Hi Erik
I have just set up the latest very latest eXist database, running externally to ops. It's looking OK so far. I think it is worthing noting that eXist has had a bit of a overhaul in the shape of eXist 1.1-newcore, from the eXist site ( http://exist.sourceforge.net/ ) : "..Based on the new indexing core. Represents a major technological switch with respect to the index system. All other areas (including most of the query engine) are identical to the 1.0 release. If you know eXist and had problems with too large/too complex documents or slow updates, try this version. " So anyone who had strange corruption issues with large documents etc it might be worth a try. Thanks Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Bruchez" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [ops-users] xdb:update > Lee, > > Who throws the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException, OPS or eXist? You should > be able to figure this out by looking at the stack trace. > > Anyway, eXist would be in charge of handling multiple concurrent > accesses, although it is hard to completely exclude that OPS is doing > something wrong. > > I don't know of any parameters you can pass to eXist via XML:DB to > control that behavior, but you may want to ask this on the exist-open > mailing-list - and it would be great if you could report the results > back to ops-users! > > -Erik > > Lee Bamford wrote: >> Hi Guys >> >> Is there are a known problem with xdb:update and eXist? I'm running the >> latest version of eXist externally. >> >> I have a few end users who are accessing a form solution (a bit like DMV >> forms) simutaneously and occasionally I get: >> >> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException >> >> The result is the form detail they are trying to save gets corrupted and >> lost. I'm saving everything to file along the way and there is nothing >> out of the ordinary there, all seems fine. I've been through various >> re-writes etc trying to pin the problem. >> >> Anyway, is there some config for: >> >> <p:processor name="oxf:xmldb-update"> >> >> ..to explicitly state locking, or protected write access? I'm pretty >> sure that the problem is around this... >> >> Please help, I'm getting a real kickin' of my client. >> >> Thanks >> Lee >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> -- >> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] >> mailing list. >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] >> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help >> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > > -- > Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] > mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] > For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Administrator
|
Lee Bamford wrote:
> Hi Erik > > I have just set up the latest very latest eXist database, running > externally to ops. It's looking OK so far. Great. > I think it is worthing noting that eXist has had a bit of a overhaul in > the shape of eXist 1.1-newcore, from the eXist site ( > http://exist.sourceforge.net/ ) : > > "..Based on the new indexing core. Represents a major technological > switch with respect > to the index system. All other areas (including most of the query > engine) are identical > to the 1.0 release. If you know eXist and had problems with too > large/too complex documents > or slow updates, try this version. " > > So anyone who had strange corruption issues with large documents etc it > might be worth a try. candidates at the moment. -Erik -- Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email] For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |