help with tool selection

> Hello all,
>
> I have searched for compare / contrast information of cocoon, chiba
> and orbeon in the mailing list archives and nothing recent has come
> up.
> I'm trying to get a sense of the relative merits of my options, namely
> OrbeonForms or Chiba+Cocoon
>
> I understand that OrbeonForms is  a more complete product and that it
> will take Chiba + Cocoon to get all the functionality that you get out
> of the box with Orbeon. Chiba seems more focused on implementing just
> XForms (server and client)
>
>    -   But how do they (OrbeonForms, Chiba+Cocoon) compare in features
> / easy of use / quality documentation?
>    -   I haven't use Cocoon but there is a rumor about it having a
> step learning curve and not so good documentation, is that (still)
> true?
>    -   I get the sense that Orbeon is XForms1.1 compliant but Chiba
> only 1.0. Is that correct or it's just outdated documentation that I'm
> reading?
>    -   One goal of my project (despite been done in Java) is to
> preserve memory use as much as reasonably possible. How the two
> solutions compare in that department?
>
> Maybe somebody already compared the two approaches, have some answer
> to those questions and can save me a few nights of trying alternatives
> -- oh yes, it is a pet project
>
> I'm posting this in both Orbeon and Chiba mailing lists
>
> Thanks!
> Jaime
>  

> I can tell you that Chiba is much slower if you have a large number of
> select elements.
>
>  -Wyatt
>
>
>
>
>  jbarciela jbarciela wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have searched for compare / contrast information of cocoon, chiba
> > and orbeon in the mailing list archives and nothing recent has come
> > up.
> > I'm trying to get a sense of the relative merits of my options, namely
> > OrbeonForms or Chiba+Cocoon
> >
> > I understand that OrbeonForms is  a more complete product and that it
> > will take Chiba + Cocoon to get all the functionality that you get out
> > of the box with Orbeon. Chiba seems more focused on implementing just
> > XForms (server and client)
> >
> >   -   But how do they (OrbeonForms, Chiba+Cocoon) compare in features
> > / easy of use / quality documentation?
> >   -   I haven't use Cocoon but there is a rumor about it having a
> > step learning curve and not so good documentation, is that (still)
> > true?
> >   -   I get the sense that Orbeon is XForms1.1 compliant but Chiba
> > only 1.0. Is that correct or it's just outdated documentation that I'm
> > reading?
> >   -   One goal of my project (despite been done in Java) is to
> > preserve memory use as much as reasonably possible. How the two
> > solutions compare in that department?
> >
> > Maybe somebody already compared the two approaches, have some answer
> > to those questions and can save me a few nights of trying alternatives
> > -- oh yes, it is a pet project
> >
> > I'm posting this in both Orbeon and Chiba mailing lists
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Jaime
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing
> list.
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>  For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>  OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>

> you are using both then?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Wyatt Tellis
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>  
>> I can tell you that Chiba is much slower if you have a large number of
>> select elements.
>>
>>  -Wyatt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  jbarciela jbarciela wrote:
>>
>>    
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I have searched for compare / contrast information of cocoon, chiba
>>> and orbeon in the mailing list archives and nothing recent has come
>>> up.
>>> I'm trying to get a sense of the relative merits of my options, namely
>>> OrbeonForms or Chiba+Cocoon
>>>
>>> I understand that OrbeonForms is  a more complete product and that it
>>> will take Chiba + Cocoon to get all the functionality that you get out
>>> of the box with Orbeon. Chiba seems more focused on implementing just
>>> XForms (server and client)
>>>
>>>   -   But how do they (OrbeonForms, Chiba+Cocoon) compare in features
>>> / easy of use / quality documentation?
>>>   -   I haven't use Cocoon but there is a rumor about it having a
>>> step learning curve and not so good documentation, is that (still)
>>> true?
>>>   -   I get the sense that Orbeon is XForms1.1 compliant but Chiba
>>> only 1.0. Is that correct or it's just outdated documentation that I'm
>>> reading?
>>>   -   One goal of my project (despite been done in Java) is to
>>> preserve memory use as much as reasonably possible. How the two
>>> solutions compare in that department?
>>>
>>> Maybe somebody already compared the two approaches, have some answer
>>> to those questions and can save me a few nights of trying alternatives
>>> -- oh yes, it is a pet project
>>>
>>> I'm posting this in both Orbeon and Chiba mailing lists
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Jaime
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing
>> list.
>>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>>  For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>>  OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>
>>
>>    

> no, started w/ chiba, but then switched to orbeon when we ran into this
> issue.
>
>
>
>
>  jbarciela jbarciela wrote:
>
> > you are using both then?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Wyatt Tellis
> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I can tell you that Chiba is much slower if you have a large number of
> > > select elements.
> > >
> > >  -Wyatt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  jbarciela jbarciela wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I have searched for compare / contrast information of cocoon, chiba
> > > > and orbeon in the mailing list archives and nothing recent has come
> > > > up.
> > > > I'm trying to get a sense of the relative merits of my options, namely
> > > > OrbeonForms or Chiba+Cocoon
> > > >
> > > > I understand that OrbeonForms is  a more complete product and that it
> > > > will take Chiba + Cocoon to get all the functionality that you get out
> > > > of the box with Orbeon. Chiba seems more focused on implementing just
> > > > XForms (server and client)
> > > >
> > > >  -   But how do they (OrbeonForms, Chiba+Cocoon) compare in features
> > > > / easy of use / quality documentation?
> > > >  -   I haven't use Cocoon but there is a rumor about it having a
> > > > step learning curve and not so good documentation, is that (still)
> > > > true?
> > > >  -   I get the sense that Orbeon is XForms1.1 compliant but Chiba
> > > > only 1.0. Is that correct or it's just outdated documentation that I'm
> > > > reading?
> > > >  -   One goal of my project (despite been done in Java) is to
> > > > preserve memory use as much as reasonably possible. How the two
> > > > solutions compare in that department?
> > > >
> > > > Maybe somebody already compared the two approaches, have some answer
> > > > to those questions and can save me a few nights of trying alternatives
> > > > -- oh yes, it is a pet project
> > > >
> > > > I'm posting this in both Orbeon and Chiba mailing lists
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Jaime
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  --
> > >  You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email]
> mailing
> > > list.
> > >  To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
> > >  For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
> > >  OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing
> list.
>  To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>  For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>  OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>