RE: Re: RE: Re: Deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE to Liferay 6.1.10 EE

> look at an alternative to integrating Form Runner as a portlet for the
> time being.
>
> As you might recall from our earlier conversations, I've had a lot of
> success integrating 3.9 using the "separate deployment with portlets
> strategy" as documented on the Wiki. This is for our custom portlet
> development strategy. I've tried what I built back then with the newer
> 3.9 PE version and it actually works better than ever. Good work!
>
> -Stian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Erik
> Bruchez
> Sent: 08 May 2012 06:12
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [ops-users] Re: Deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE to Liferay 6.1.10 EE
>
>
> Stian,
>
> It's had some success with nightly builds after fixing this issue 2
> months ago:
>
>

> a0598c5fb9357f
>
> I fear that 3.9.x won't work without at least that fix, but that might
> not be enough as there were quite a bit of portlet-related changes
> since 3.9.0.
>
> I will be doing some Liferay work this week so hopefully can check
> again that the nightly builds are behaving.
>
> -Erik
>
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Stian Sigvartsen
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Is anyone aware of anyone having any success deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE
> to
>> Liferay 6.1.10 EE? i.e. the most recent releases of both at the time
> of
>> writing.
>>
>> I have been successful in deploying said Orbeon to Tomcat 7.0.25

> had
>> to explode the orbeon.war before deploying it. I think this may have
>> something to do with the problems I am facing when deploying
> orbeon.war
>> through Liferay's "deploy" directory.
>>
>> The last message I see in catalina.out is: "INFO
>> [PortletAutoDeployListener:81] Portlets for
>> /Applications/Servers/liferay-portal-6.1.10-ee-ga1/deploy/orbeon.war
> copied
>> successfully. Deployment will start in a few seconds."
>>
>> I've also tried to deploy the orbeon-proxy-portlet.war (the form
> runner
>> proxy). I had some limited success if do as I describe and deploy the
>> exploded Orbeon war directly to the Tomcat webapps directory directly
> so
>> that it's available at http://localhost:8080/orbeon and install this
> proxy.
>> The portlet successfully renders the bookcase form, but if you
> interact with
>> it, it displays an error dialog and the log says that the session has
>> expired.
>>
>> I can provide more details, but I was just wondering if this is a
> general
>> problem or not.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> -Stian
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email]
> mailing
>> list.
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email]

> Hi Eric
>
> I noticed your recently added Wiki page
> http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/contributor-guide/test-plan .
> Great to see a test for "dropping the WAR file (with license) into
> Tomcat and Liferay works out of the box" is a featured test.
> Also great that there will be support for the "noscript" mode for the
> "full portlet". This will help in us adopting this as a corporate forms
> solution because accessibility is important to us.
>
> Have you got any idea at this stage when 4.0 PE will be released?
>
> -Stian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Erik
> Bruchez
> Sent: 10 May 2012 04:52
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [ops-users] Re: RE: Re: Deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE to Liferay
> 6.1.10 EE
>
>
> Stian,
>
> Great to hear. Support will be in 4.0. As for 3.9.x, that's possible
> but we can't say for sure, as it might take some effort to backport
> fixes.
>
> -Erik
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Stian Sigvartsen
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks Erik.
>>
>> We will soon be integrating the Orbeon form 3.9 PE we are now licensed
>> for. Having a strategy to securely (inc. user auth) deliver Orbeon
> forms
>> designed by our non-technical staff will be key to the success of our
>> overall implementation. Liferay provides this secure access, enabling
>> Orbeon to hide behind our firewall. That isn't to say that there
>> wouldn't be other ways to achieve this without Liferay, I just haven't
>> spent much time investigating that. Would be great if support for
> Orbeon
>> Form Runner (Builder support would be great too of course, but not
>> critical to us) will be available in 3.9 PE soon, but if the issues
> are
>> complex then I would really appreciate if you would let me know so I
> can
>> look at an alternative to integrating Form Runner as a portlet for the
>> time being.
>>
>> As you might recall from our earlier conversations, I've had a lot of
>> success integrating 3.9 using the "separate deployment with portlets
>> strategy" as documented on the Wiki. This is for our custom portlet
>> development strategy. I've tried what I built back then with the newer
>> 3.9 PE version and it actually works better than ever. Good work!
>>
>> -Stian
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Erik
>> Bruchez
>> Sent: 08 May 2012 06:12
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: [ops-users] Re: Deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE to Liferay 6.1.10 EE
>>
>>
>> Stian,
>>
>> It's had some success with nightly builds after fixing this issue 2
>> months ago:
>>
>>
> https://github.com/orbeon/orbeon-forms/commit/d2c85938c7b4d642fda98219f8
>> a0598c5fb9357f
>>
>> I fear that 3.9.x won't work without at least that fix, but that might
>> not be enough as there were quite a bit of portlet-related changes
>> since 3.9.0.
>>
>> I will be doing some Liferay work this week so hopefully can check
>> again that the nightly builds are behaving.
>>
>> -Erik
>>
>> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Stian Sigvartsen
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Is anyone aware of anyone having any success deploying Orbeon 3.9 PE
>> to
>>> Liferay 6.1.10 EE? i.e. the most recent releases of both at the time
>> of
>>> writing.
>>>
>>> I have been successful in deploying said Orbeon to Tomcat 7.0.25
> which
>> me
>>> Liferay 6.1.10 runs under (standard bundle), but in order to do this
> I
>> had
>>> to explode the orbeon.war before deploying it. I think this may have
>>> something to do with the problems I am facing when deploying
>> orbeon.war
>>> through Liferay's "deploy" directory.
>>>
>>> The last message I see in catalina.out is: "INFO
>>> [PortletAutoDeployListener:81] Portlets for
>>> /Applications/Servers/liferay-portal-6.1.10-ee-ga1/deploy/orbeon.war
>> copied
>>> successfully. Deployment will start in a few seconds."
>>>
>>> I've also tried to deploy the orbeon-proxy-portlet.war (the form
>> runner
>>> proxy). I had some limited success if do as I describe and deploy the
>>> exploded Orbeon war directly to the Tomcat webapps directory directly
>> so
>>> that it's available at http://localhost:8080/orbeon and install this
>> proxy.
>>> The portlet successfully renders the bookcase form, but if you
>> interact with
>>> it, it displays an error dialog and the log says that the session has
>>> expired.
>>>
>>> I can provide more details, but I was just wondering if this is a
>> general
>>> problem or not.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> -Stian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email]
>> mailing
>>> list.
>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>>> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email]
> mailing list.
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
>> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [hidden email] mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[hidden email]
> For general help: mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help
> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>