Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

smylie
Alex or anyone,

Alex, I posted a message not long ago about how to configure orbeon to to talk to an external instance of an exist db instead of its internal exist db. I figured that out but now we have a bigger challenge that we've been struggling with for a few days. We have gone through most of the orbeon documentation and done a lot of search on this forum as well as orbeon site but have not found a clear or specific instructions no how to embed or integrate the orbeon form runner with a separate installation of exist-db external to the orbeon installation.

However, we want to use what we have developed in exist db without having to use the form builder to create forms from scratch. Essentially, we want to configure our exist db to replace the betterForm engine with orbeon form runner.

* We haven't packaged our application into any WAR file as such because our app will be packaged as xar file for deployment per exist documentation. So, our understanding is that our deployment package will not be like a java deployment package. These are the closet tips to what we want to accomplish that we have found on orbeon site so far.

* According to "XForms - Using the Orbeon Forms XForms Engine with Java Applications" topic in this link: http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/developer-guide/xforms-with-java-applications 

1 - We are adding the following to web.xml file under EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF

<filter>
    <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
    <filter-class>org.orbeon.oxf.servlet.OrbeonXFormsFilter</filter-class>
    <init-param>
        <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.context</param-name>
        <param-value>/orbeon</param-value>
    </init-param>
    <init-param>
        <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.default-encoding</param-name>
        <param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
    </init-param>
</filter>

<filter-mapping>
    <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
    <url-pattern>/myapp/*</url-pattern>
    <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
    <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
</filter-mapping>

<filter-mapping>
    <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
    <url-pattern>/orbeon/*</url-pattern>
    <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
    <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
</filter-mapping>

2 - We are not deploying our app as a WAR file
3 - We have deployed orbeon under tomcat as suggested in the orbeon documents
3 - Copy WEB-INF/lib/orbeon-xforms-filter.jar from the Orbeon Forms WAR into our EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF/lib/ directory
4 - Setup our application in cross-context mode. This is supposed to go in server.xml file but the only server.xml file under exist home is in /test/src/ant directory which doesn't seem to be the right file. Additionally, we are not sure whether the parameter values are correct or not in this tag.
        <Context path="/myapp" docBase="/apps/myapp" crossContext="true"/>
5 - Disable betterForm in betterform-config.xml as such
        <property name="filter.ignoreResponseBody" value="true" />
       
To summarize, our goal is to use our application developed in exist-db to take advantage of orbeon form runner instead of native betterForm, by wrapping our existing xform code with orbeon form tags without having to rebuild anything using orbeon interface. Any clear instructions on how to accomplish this is very much appreciated.

Thanks,
Smylie
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Alessandro  Vernet
Administrator
Hi Musa,

First, you're saying that you don't wish/need to use Form Builder to
create the forms, since you already have existing forms you'd like to
leverage. So far so good.

But you seem to want to use Form Runner. Is this really what you'd
like or are specifically looking for the XForms engine?

To be more specific, Form Runner adds a number of capabilities on top
of what XForms provides, but it also needs forms to be in a special
format, which might not be a good fit if you want to reuse existing
XForms with minimal modifications.

Alex

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:07 PM, smylie <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Alex or anyone,
>
> Alex, I posted a message not long ago about how to configure orbeon to to
> talk to an external instance of an exist db instead of its internal exist
> db. I figured that out but now we have a bigger challenge that we've been
> struggling with for a few days. We have gone through most of the orbeon
> documentation and done a lot of search on this forum as well as orbeon site
> but have not found a clear or specific instructions no how to embed or
> integrate the orbeon form runner with a separate installation of exist-db
> external to the orbeon installation.
>
> However, we want to use what we have developed in exist db without having to
> use the form builder to create forms from scratch. Essentially, we want to
> configure our exist db to replace the betterForm engine with orbeon form
> runner.
>
> * We haven't packaged our application into any WAR file as such because our
> app will be packaged as xar file for deployment per exist documentation. So,
> our understanding is that our deployment package will not be like a java
> deployment package. These are the closet tips to what we want to accomplish
> that we have found on orbeon site so far.
>
> * According to "XForms - Using the Orbeon Forms XForms Engine with Java
> Applications" topic in this link:
> http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/developer-guide/xforms-with-java-applications
>
> 1 - We are adding the following to web.xml file under
> EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF
>
> <filter>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <filter-class>org.orbeon.oxf.servlet.OrbeonXFormsFilter</filter-class>
>     <init-param>
>         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.context</param-name>
>         <param-value>/orbeon</param-value>
>     </init-param>
>     <init-param>
>         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.default-encoding</param-name>
>         <param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
>     </init-param>
> </filter>
>
> <filter-mapping>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <url-pattern>/myapp/*</url-pattern>
>     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
> </filter-mapping>
>
> <filter-mapping>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <url-pattern>/orbeon/*</url-pattern>
>     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
> </filter-mapping>
>
> 2 - We are not deploying our app as a WAR file
> 3 - We have deployed orbeon under tomcat as suggested in the orbeon
> documents
> 3 - Copy WEB-INF/lib/orbeon-xforms-filter.jar from the Orbeon Forms WAR into
> our EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF/lib/ directory
> 4 - Setup our application in cross-context mode. This is supposed to go in
> server.xml file but the only server.xml file under exist home is in
> /test/src/ant directory which doesn't seem to be the right file.
> Additionally, we are not sure whether the parameter values are correct or
> not in this tag.
>         <Context path="/myapp" docBase="/apps/myapp" crossContext="true"/>
> 5 - Disable betterForm in betterform-config.xml as such
>         <property name="filter.ignoreResponseBody" value="true" />
>
> To summarize, our goal is to use our application developed in exist-db to
> take advantage of orbeon form runner instead of native betterForm, by
> wrapping our existing xform code with orbeon form tags without having to
> rebuild anything using orbeon interface. Any clear instructions on how to
> accomplish this is very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Smylie
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://discuss.orbeon.com/Embedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html
> Sent from the Orbeon Forms community mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
> To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].
--
Follow Orbeon on Twitter: @orbeon
Follow me on Twitter: @avernet
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Lance
Hi Alex, 

Musa and I are working together on this project. First, thanks for all of your help with this. It is very much appreciated.

Part of the issue here, I think, is that Musa and I are both still trying to understand Orbeon and very likely misusing Orbeon terminology as we attempt to describe what it is we're trying to do. Our exist-db web app uses xquery to return xforms through exist-db's rest interface. It is an XRX web app. The problem is that we are not particularly fond of the look and feel of either betterFORM or XSLTForms and would therefore like to switch to Orbeon so that we can get the very polished look and feel that only Orbeon offers. 

It is our understanding that switching to Orbeon is possible; however, we do not know how much work it will take or understand exactly how best to go about it. We don't know whether we're supposed to use Form Runner, Form Builder, both or neither, for example. We were looking at the xforms-with-java-applications document most recently because we thought it sounded like the closest possible match to what we imagine needing, but the truth is that neither of us really knows which Orbeon document(s) is most relevant to our context or exactly which type of implementation we should be working toward.

Having said that, I suspect the answer to your question below is that we are specifically looking for the XForms engine. If, however, only having the XForms engine means that we would not be able to make our forms look polished and pretty, then that is not the answer and we must be looking for something else. Sorry to be so vague, Alex, but hopefully this will make sense and give you enough information to help steer us in the right direction.

Thanks again,
Lance


On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 1:33:23 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Vernet wrote:
Hi Musa,

First, you're saying that you don't wish/need to use Form Builder to
create the forms, since you already have existing forms you'd like to
leverage. So far so good.

But you seem to want to use Form Runner. Is this really what you'd
like or are specifically looking for the XForms engine?

To be more specific, Form Runner adds a number of capabilities on top
of what XForms provides, but it also needs forms to be in a special
format, which might not be a good fit if you want to reuse existing
XForms with minimal modifications.

Alex

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:07 PM, smylie <<a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="WbYRNQ7oOEQJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">smyl...@...> wrote:

> Alex or anyone,
>
> Alex, I posted a message not long ago about how to configure orbeon to to
> talk to an external instance of an exist db instead of its internal exist
> db. I figured that out but now we have a bigger challenge that we've been
> struggling with for a few days. We have gone through most of the orbeon
> documentation and done a lot of search on this forum as well as orbeon site
> but have not found a clear or specific instructions no how to embed or
> integrate the orbeon form runner with a separate installation of exist-db
> external to the orbeon installation.
>
> However, we want to use what we have developed in exist db without having to
> use the form builder to create forms from scratch. Essentially, we want to
> configure our exist db to replace the betterForm engine with orbeon form
> runner.
>
> * We haven't packaged our application into any WAR file as such because our
> app will be packaged as xar file for deployment per exist documentation. So,
> our understanding is that our deployment package will not be like a java
> deployment package. These are the closet tips to what we want to accomplish
> that we have found on orbeon site so far.
>
> * According to "XForms - Using the Orbeon Forms XForms Engine with Java
> Applications" topic in this link:
> <a href="http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/developer-guide/xforms-with-java-applications" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.orbeon.com%2Fforms%2Fdoc%2Fdeveloper-guide%2Fxforms-with-java-applications\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNGsSncSuDrcvwMxjJB5KC2aMNZqsQ';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.orbeon.com%2Fforms%2Fdoc%2Fdeveloper-guide%2Fxforms-with-java-applications\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNGsSncSuDrcvwMxjJB5KC2aMNZqsQ';return true;">http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/developer-guide/xforms-with-java-applications
>
> 1 - We are adding the following to web.xml file under
> EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF
>
> <filter>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <filter-class>org.orbeon.oxf.servlet.OrbeonXFormsFilter</filter-class>
>     <init-param>
>         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.context</param-name>
>         <param-value>/orbeon</param-value>
>     </init-param>
>     <init-param>
>         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.default-encoding</param-name>
>         <param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
>     </init-param>
> </filter>
>
> <filter-mapping>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <url-pattern>/myapp/*</url-pattern>
>     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
> </filter-mapping>
>
> <filter-mapping>
>     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>     <url-pattern>/orbeon/*</url-pattern>
>     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
> </filter-mapping>
>
> 2 - We are not deploying our app as a WAR file
> 3 - We have deployed orbeon under tomcat as suggested in the orbeon
> documents
> 3 - Copy WEB-INF/lib/orbeon-xforms-filter.jar from the Orbeon Forms WAR into
> our EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF/lib/ directory
> 4 - Setup our application in cross-context mode. This is supposed to go in
> server.xml file but the only server.xml file under exist home is in
> /test/src/ant directory which doesn't seem to be the right file.
> Additionally, we are not sure whether the parameter values are correct or
> not in this tag.
>         <Context path="/myapp" docBase="/apps/myapp" crossContext="true"/>
> 5 - Disable betterForm in betterform-config.xml as such
>         <property name="filter.ignoreResponseBody" value="true" />
>
> To summarize, our goal is to use our application developed in exist-db to
> take advantage of orbeon form runner instead of native betterForm, by
> wrapping our existing xform code with orbeon form tags without having to
> rebuild anything using orbeon interface. Any clear instructions on how to
> accomplish this is very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Smylie
>
> --
> View this message in context: <a href="http://discuss.orbeon.com/Embedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.orbeon.com%2FEmbedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNGsEULt2JVE-QodLNmAnmI--8WtxA';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.orbeon.com%2FEmbedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNGsEULt2JVE-QodLNmAnmI--8WtxA';return true;">http://discuss.orbeon.com/Embedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html
> Sent from the Orbeon Forms community mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="WbYRNQ7oOEQJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">orbeon+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to <a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="WbYRNQ7oOEQJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">orb...@....

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Alessandro  Vernet
Administrator
Hi Lance,

It is hard for me to say whether using Form Builder would be a good
fit for your application. To determine whether this is the case, I'd
encourage you to try it. See if you can build the forms you have in
mind, or re-build the forms you already have. If it doesn't look like
a good fit, then you can use "just" the XForms engine, but you won't
benefit from all the features provided by Form Builder / Form Runner
(in short, a visual tool to create forms, and what is offered by Form
Runner on top of XForms).

And of course, if you have any specific question about Form Builder /
Form Runner, or the XForms, just let us know and we'll do our best to
help.

Alex

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Lance <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Musa and I are working together on this project. First, thanks for all of
> your help with this. It is very much appreciated.
>
> Part of the issue here, I think, is that Musa and I are both still trying to
> understand Orbeon and very likely misusing Orbeon terminology as we attempt
> to describe what it is we're trying to do. Our exist-db web app uses xquery
> to return xforms through exist-db's rest interface. It is an XRX web app.
> The problem is that we are not particularly fond of the look and feel of
> either betterFORM or XSLTForms and would therefore like to switch to Orbeon
> so that we can get the very polished look and feel that only Orbeon offers.
>
> It is our understanding that switching to Orbeon is possible; however, we do
> not know how much work it will take or understand exactly how best to go
> about it. We don't know whether we're supposed to use Form Runner, Form
> Builder, both or neither, for example. We were looking at the
> xforms-with-java-applications document most recently because we thought it
> sounded like the closest possible match to what we imagine needing, but the
> truth is that neither of us really knows which Orbeon document(s) is most
> relevant to our context or exactly which type of implementation we should be
> working toward.
>
> Having said that, I suspect the answer to your question below is that we are
> specifically looking for the XForms engine. If, however, only having the
> XForms engine means that we would not be able to make our forms look
> polished and pretty, then that is not the answer and we must be looking for
> something else. Sorry to be so vague, Alex, but hopefully this will make
> sense and give you enough information to help steer us in the right
> direction.
>
> Thanks again,
> Lance
>
>
> On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 1:33:23 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Vernet wrote:
>>
>> Hi Musa,
>>
>> First, you're saying that you don't wish/need to use Form Builder to
>> create the forms, since you already have existing forms you'd like to
>> leverage. So far so good.
>>
>> But you seem to want to use Form Runner. Is this really what you'd
>> like or are specifically looking for the XForms engine?
>>
>> To be more specific, Form Runner adds a number of capabilities on top
>> of what XForms provides, but it also needs forms to be in a special
>> format, which might not be a good fit if you want to reuse existing
>> XForms with minimal modifications.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:07 PM, smylie <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Alex or anyone,
>> >
>> > Alex, I posted a message not long ago about how to configure orbeon to
>> > to
>> > talk to an external instance of an exist db instead of its internal
>> > exist
>> > db. I figured that out but now we have a bigger challenge that we've
>> > been
>> > struggling with for a few days. We have gone through most of the orbeon
>> > documentation and done a lot of search on this forum as well as orbeon
>> > site
>> > but have not found a clear or specific instructions no how to embed or
>> > integrate the orbeon form runner with a separate installation of
>> > exist-db
>> > external to the orbeon installation.
>> >
>> > However, we want to use what we have developed in exist db without
>> > having to
>> > use the form builder to create forms from scratch. Essentially, we want
>> > to
>> > configure our exist db to replace the betterForm engine with orbeon form
>> > runner.
>> >
>> > * We haven't packaged our application into any WAR file as such because
>> > our
>> > app will be packaged as xar file for deployment per exist documentation.
>> > So,
>> > our understanding is that our deployment package will not be like a java
>> > deployment package. These are the closet tips to what we want to
>> > accomplish
>> > that we have found on orbeon site so far.
>> >
>> > * According to "XForms - Using the Orbeon Forms XForms Engine with Java
>> > Applications" topic in this link:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.orbeon.com/forms/doc/developer-guide/xforms-with-java-applications
>> >
>> > 1 - We are adding the following to web.xml file under
>> > EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF
>> >
>> > <filter>
>> >     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>> >
>> > <filter-class>org.orbeon.oxf.servlet.OrbeonXFormsFilter</filter-class>
>> >     <init-param>
>> >         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.context</param-name>
>> >         <param-value>/orbeon</param-value>
>> >     </init-param>
>> >     <init-param>
>> >         <param-name>oxf.xforms.renderer.default-encoding</param-name>
>> >         <param-value>UTF-8</param-value>
>> >     </init-param>
>> > </filter>
>> >
>> > <filter-mapping>
>> >     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>> >     <url-pattern>/myapp/*</url-pattern>
>> >     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>> >     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
>> > </filter-mapping>
>> >
>> > <filter-mapping>
>> >     <filter-name>orbeon-xforms-filter</filter-name>
>> >     <url-pattern>/orbeon/*</url-pattern>
>> >     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
>> >     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
>> > </filter-mapping>
>> >
>> > 2 - We are not deploying our app as a WAR file
>> > 3 - We have deployed orbeon under tomcat as suggested in the orbeon
>> > documents
>> > 3 - Copy WEB-INF/lib/orbeon-xforms-filter.jar from the Orbeon Forms WAR
>> > into
>> > our EXIST_HOME/webapps/WEB-INF/lib/ directory
>> > 4 - Setup our application in cross-context mode. This is supposed to go
>> > in
>> > server.xml file but the only server.xml file under exist home is in
>> > /test/src/ant directory which doesn't seem to be the right file.
>> > Additionally, we are not sure whether the parameter values are correct
>> > or
>> > not in this tag.
>> >         <Context path="/myapp" docBase="/apps/myapp"
>> > crossContext="true"/>
>> > 5 - Disable betterForm in betterform-config.xml as such
>> >         <property name="filter.ignoreResponseBody" value="true" />
>> >
>> > To summarize, our goal is to use our application developed in exist-db
>> > to
>> > take advantage of orbeon form runner instead of native betterForm, by
>> > wrapping our existing xform code with orbeon form tags without having to
>> > rebuild anything using orbeon interface. Any clear instructions on how
>> > to
>> > accomplish this is very much appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Smylie
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> > http://discuss.orbeon.com/Embedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842.html
>> > Sent from the Orbeon Forms community mailing list mailing list archive
>> > at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an email to [hidden email].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Orbeon Forms" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [hidden email].
> To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].
--
Follow Orbeon on Twitter: @orbeon
Follow me on Twitter: @avernet
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Lance
Thanks Alex. I think we're finally making some progress although I must admit it has been tough going. FYI - the XForms Tutorial lists 'my-bookcast' for its rest path, but as best I can tell, it should be 'xforms-bookcast'.

Lance
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Alessandro  Vernet
Administrator
Hi Lance,

I think that the idea is that you're creating a new "app" called
my-bookcast, but while doing so, if you wish, you can look at the
already done xforms-bookcast.

Alex

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Lance <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks Alex. I think we're finally making some progress although I must admit
> it has been tough going. FYI - the XForms Tutorial lists 'my-bookcast' for
> its rest path, but as best I can tell, it should be 'xforms-bookcast'.
>
> Lance
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://discuss.orbeon.com/Embedding-form-runner-in-a-separate-exist-db-installation-tp4659842p4659883.html
> Sent from the Orbeon Forms community mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
> To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Orbeon Forms" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
To post to this group, send email to [hidden email].
--
Follow Orbeon on Twitter: @orbeon
Follow me on Twitter: @avernet
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Embedding form runner in a separate exist-db installation

Lance
Oops, you're right. Wasn't thinking about that. Thanks Alex!